
A fake tax notice, altered bank details, a doctored payslip, a printed ID card: document fraud is now within anyone's reach. Websites sell ready-to-fill templates, and generative AI produces convincing documents in seconds. Document fraud detection can no longer rely on an analyst's eye. Here are the types of forgery, the signals that give them away and the detection methods that work.
Each form calls for a different check. A solution that only verifies document authenticity will miss identity theft; a solution that only does biometrics will miss falsified bank details.
A font that changes on a single field, misaligned text, irregular spacing, an area sharper or blurrier than the rest, a pixelated logo, a non-uniform background around a figure: falsification almost always leaves a local trace.
A document must be consistent with itself. On a payslip, net pay must follow from gross pay and contributions. On an ID document, the MRZ encodes the printed information and includes calculated check digits: an MRZ that does not match the visible fields is a strong signal. An IBAN also has a check key.
A PDF keeps a record of its history: creation software, creation and modification dates, number of versions, embedded fonts. A payslip "issued by payroll software" but edited in a PDF editor the day before it was sent deserves a second look. Note: the absence of suspicious metadata proves nothing, and a screenshot or scan wipes this information.
This is often where fraud shows most clearly. Does the name on the bank details match the ID? The address on the tax notice match the proof of address? The salary on the payslip match declared income? Does the employer actually exist in the business register? Fraudsters rarely take the same care with every document.
The most reliable check is not to trust the document and to query the issuer or a register instead:
An experienced analyst spots crude forgeries. They cannot see a change of a few pixels, cannot read metadata on every file, and cannot cross-check five documents in thirty seconds. At high volume, fatigue does the rest.
Generative AI has changed the game: it produces documents without the classic visual defects, as well as convincing ID images. Detection must therefore combine several layers — image analysis, metadata, internal consistency, cross-document consistency and source verification — rather than rely on a single signal.
Dataleon's document fraud module analyzes every document uploaded — ID, company registration, bank details, payslips, supporting documents — combining visual analysis, metadata, internal consistency and cross-document checks. Every alert is explained: your analysts see why a document is suspicious, and no longer waste time on clean files. To choose a tool, see also our guide document fraud software: selection criteria.
Metadata (creation software, modification dates, successive versions) and analysis of the file structure provide clues. But a re-scanned or photographed file loses this information: you then have to rely on visual analysis and cross-checking.
Yes, but rarely through a single check. Generated documents often reveal content inconsistencies (invalid numbers, wrong calculations, data that matches no register) rather than visual defects.
Yes. In France, forgery and use of forged documents are punishable under the Criminal Code (Article 441-1). For an obliged entity, a detected forgery may also justify a suspicious activity report.
Request a demo to test detection on your own documents.